Help Support Our Growing Community

DOTAFire is a community that lives to help every Dota 2 player take their game to the next level by having open access to all our tools and resources. Please consider supporting us by whitelisting us in your ad blocker!

Want to support DOTAFire with an ad-free experience? You can support us ad-free for less than $1 a month!

Go Ad-Free
Smitefire logo

Join the leading DOTA 2 community.
Create and share Hero Guides and Builds.

Create an MFN Account






Or

help in resolving an argument?

Please review our General Rules & Guidelines before posting or commenting anywhere on DOTAFire.

Forum » General Discussion » help in resolving an argument? 20 posts - page 2 of 2
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by Zerak Kyria » March 13, 2014 12:00pm | Report
Very well done Smuggles, it sounds logical to me and I am going to agree with you, However I only see this as happening more in lower level games than higher level ones due to people actually knowing how to counter heroes.
Your new diet for heroes; You will need 4 wards (cuz wards taste better), 1 set of tangoes, 1 mango, 1 cheese.
With this you can make a nice Tango Mango Cheese platter. You can wash this all down with a nice bottle of water, Can be flavoured with red, green, yellow, blue, purple AND GOLD!
Caution: Taking roshan 3 times is required.

Zerak Kyria


Notable (8)
Posts: 436
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by Smuggels » March 14, 2014 1:19am | Report
good point, by placing a certain hero in different lanes it changes the play style of that hero or in the oppositions mind how they expect you to play that hero...

i.e. invoker picked begets the idea that he will be placed mid, and played in a 2 position, when lane'd safe lane as a support for a hard carry, it would mean that the play style that the opposition had in mind when they saw the invoker pick is now changed.

so you could say the three factors for a player effect hero have a 1 and 2 category.

when placed mid (DK1) dragon knight would illicit a completely separate reaction of the three factors then when placed in lane (DK2).

the hero playing mid having played against a DK mid a lot might have consistently had good games against him. but at the same time that same mid might have played in games where DK wasn't mid and was placed safe lane and absolutely destroyed mid to late game for him/her. thus causing the mid player to swap up their roaming routine to exclusively ganking bottom in fear of a fed mid game Dk.

i like this aspect of the player psychology in response to hero picks.

hahaha yea man go ahead link me it when you finish it :D

I WILL DESTROY YOU ALL.... WITH FLUFFY BUNNIES


Smuggels

Awards Showcase
Show more awards

Memorable (82)
Posts: 2138
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by ScarPe » March 15, 2014 1:20pm | Report
Smuggels wrote:

so thanks to you lads, im better able to explain :)

ok here we go :) ...

Certain heroes when picked have a larger or more significant affect on how the enemy players react in game due to a variety of factors. these factors are based upon the 3 things.

1. Player history (the most important factor)
- players may have a history of playing against certain heroes and getting horribly destroyed by them, these games impact upon the players memory and affect how he/she responds to that hero in future.
i.e. being more cautious, retreating from chases and different item builds.
i.e. being repetitively pub stomped by a rampaging Bristleback will cause a player when faced with a bristle pick to alter his/her game play.

2. hero abilities
- certain hero's have abilities that affect teams as a whole, not just in team fights. These abilities cause the team/players to react differently to certain situations in game.
i.e. playing against a Riki, players will avoid solo pushing unless they have vision or are actively baiting Riki.
i.e. playing against a Mirana, players will move erratically to counter her arrow as well as when 5 man pushing keeping invisibility detection high against a Moonlight Shadow team gank.

3.Hero play style
-heroes with a certain play style's that provide an advantage illicit stronger reactions from enemy players and in effect, changing the mindset of the opposition.
i.e. a jungling Lifestealer is a threat to late game durable carries, players actively try to gank in jungle to shutdown early.
i.e. Timbersaw or Bristleback are incredibly dangerous solo off-laners, by being put in lane against a hero such as these the stronger reaction from most players is to play a bit more aggressive then normal or to play more cautiously, even to rotate lanes more frequently to try and starve them of early levels.

most of this is also just good strategy, counter Riki with vision, counter pick Brood Mother with an Earth Shaker, place a stun heavy aggressive Trilane against an Off-lane Timbersaw. But i feel confident to say that a definite psychological effect, when all three factors are considered, does change how players react to certain heroes and does give credence to the term "Player Effect Hero"


what do you guys think? sound logical?



its not realistic.

1st of all, heros you mentioned in the first post: pudge, riki, drow arent greedy at all.
they are the complete opposite of greedy,
as they get their potential core (item and skillwise) very early on in the game.

so with this heros, you basically want to achieve map-objectives as soon as possible.
none of them has skills that make them good farmers, so they need to snowball
by killing and most of all - destroying towers. (tower > kills, even though kills often lead to a tower)

so if you build a team around those heros, you are forced into a specific playstyle.
the other side of the medallion is: the opponents know this too,
so they can pick against your upcoming gameplay, as it is very obvious on some of the heros (especially riki, drow and pudge).

the next thing is very important and i think you didnt think about it yet:
the most standard way to pick a team nowadays is a 3/1/1 destribution.
as i already argued, you wanna play as defensive trilane against such draft.

so watch out for defensive trilanes in most progames and you will mention thats is very likely
the case, that one of those support heros is capable of farming in jungle, which negates your aregument of "they have to buy more dust/sentry as usual" by default.


the next thing is:
you say, against pudge most people have to hug towers in order to avoid getting hooked.
well, a defensive trilane normally WANTS to hook the tower anyway,
because most of the time, they protect a hardcarry and as long as he dosent die, everything is fine,
because if sniper/drow/pudge/riki do not snowball, they wont stand a chance the further the game progresses.

---

a tip from me:
the easiest way to build a draft around pudge, is to add supports that guarantee 100% hooks.
you can do such with bane (nightmare), shaker (fissure range 1400, hook range 1400), alch stun (just make sure you have sth like a ward to see the enemy if he walks back near his tower)...


also note: sniper is somewhat different as he is a hero that wins every mid matchup by default with his new 1000 range.

ScarPe


Notable (1)
Posts: 22
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by Smuggels » March 17, 2014 3:37am | Report
ScarPe good points made, but i think you have missed out completely on what i was explaining and you have kind of just repeated what i said.

my mate said that they were greedy and i disagreed as per above " he says they are greedy and i agree "Mostly" i feel they fall under the (player effect hero)",

"greedy"- by greedy i feel he means "requiring gold at the expense of the team"

i agree they get their core abilities at level 6 or lower. they do require kill>towers to snowball. they do force their own team into a certain playstyle but at the same time they force the enemy team into a counter playstyle, which if you read is what i was getting at.

and you said "support hero is capable of farming in jungle which negates your argument of they have to buy more dust and sentry wards" ... technically it doesnt. they still would have to buy more dust or sentry wards then normal and they still would have to alter their playstyle to counter them. This is what i was explaining.

Your "defensive trilane" point.

as per above (again) i have already raised this.

"when playing against such a hero a stun heavy aggressive trilane is a good counter"

most of what you raise is exactly what i said in the final paragraph.

"most of this is also just good strategy, counter Riki with vision, counter pick Brood Mother with an Earth Shaker, place a stun heavy aggressive Trilane against an Off-lane Timbersaw. "

you seem to have missed the point of the post.

which was "Is there such a thing as a player effect hero?"

i was talking more about the psychological effect hero picks have upon the player and how this influences their playstyle, also on how certain hero abilities have the a similar effect upon the player and their response to those abilities. mostly (as per above again) these can be negated by good strategy, as Zerak Kyria says "in higher levels these heroes would have a diminished effect", i agree at higher levels these heroes are easily countered but they still require a change of mindset by the opponent just not as drastic when the first factor is taken into account.

also, and i just thought of this, when you get into the pro games i actually feel that the title "player effect hero" turns on a whole new light.

for example imagine in pro games the psychological effect upon the enemy team, if Dendi picked a Pudge and he is known to be the best Pudge player in the world. they would feel that even if they countered him he would still be able to outplay them. i love this aspect of it as the ability to counter a pick is completely turned on its head if the player is insanely good with that pick. just remember the reaction at TI3 when dendi got a Pudge pick, the whole crowd went insane. im certain this would have a definite psychological effect upon the oppostion. which is what my whole post was about ...

apologies for the wall of text.

I WILL DESTROY YOU ALL.... WITH FLUFFY BUNNIES


Smuggels

Awards Showcase
Show more awards

Memorable (82)
Posts: 2138
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by officialshumski » March 26, 2014 6:16am | Report
Tell your mate to shove it up his arse... and play w/e he wants. :D On a serious note, now! Your mate seems like the 'person that got rekt 10000 times by "noob" heroes'. I believe there is a stage in everyone's dota career *cough* if you could call it like this when they think that they should hate on the overpicked heroes and give certain reasons why those heroes are non-effective. This might not be the case but if it is it's okay... The better your mate becomes at the game the more he'll start enjoying all heroes. He'll eventually understand that a hero is effective if the player is effective himself. True that riki is easily countered, sniper is really fragile and etc. But they are also really easy and straight forward heroes to play, so a good player can have a lot of fun with them and be very very effective. So in summary tell your mate to think objectively and just try to get better at the game as an overall player not just to be good and focused on "effective" heroes and hate on the overpicked "scrub" ones.
SOLO OFFLANE OR FEED!

officialshumski



Posts: 11
Steam: [TMCA] Shumski
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by Gindi » April 2, 2014 12:45pm | Report
In pro games if they see you pick drow they get even more confident...
Definitely pshycological influence.

Nightstalker is a pshycological hero:
-When it is night you **** your pants and he sees you before you see him.
-His ulti now reduces vision leaving you dead in the water.
-At night he hits hard o_0

You overestimate his damage because of fear.

Enigma forces the enemies never to group up.
Nyx Assassin greatly discourages split pushing.
Techies cause the enemies to not be able to move out of their base... (Hehe)
"Dreams can come true, IF you lend me your credit card"

Gindi



Posts: 16
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by mastadoom » April 2, 2014 8:52pm | Report
Smuggels wrote:

hahhaha battlefury on a bounty hunter ... if i see an enemy one building it, i automatically think woohoo we have won lol, if i see a team mate building it, i think the opposite haha

and his whole point was that they don't have any team positive abilities, as in no team fight presence. i was arguing that they do but it is more a team player presence.
the main sticking point was that there is no such thing as a psychological effect hero which i argued there was.


I heard people bashing BF BH, so i TLDR this tread
http://dotabuff.com/players/83940200/matches?date=&duration=&faction=&game_mode=&hero=bounty-hunter&lobby_type=

I mean, without a BF how else are you supposed to rat doto bounty.

mastadoom


Notable (7)
Posts: 339
View My Blog
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by Timminatorr » April 3, 2014 12:48am | Report
mastadoom wrote:



I heard people bashing BF BH, so i TLDR this tread
http://dotabuff.com/players/83940200/matches?date=&duration=&faction=&game_mode=&hero=bounty-hunter&lobby_type=

I mean, without a BF how else are you supposed to rat doto bounty.

We are mainly talking about the horrible bounty's who rush battle fury and as a result are useless for about 20 minutes, during the period where bounty's skills are really effective.
Then they farm some more becouse first they get an item then is useless early game, and then they get an item that is useless late game, usually S&Y.

But even when ratting i dont think it is worth it getting a mediocre item such as battlefury that late.
You can get necrobook, mealstrom/mjollnir, or even manta if you want to slitpush faster, but you should mainly be the guy to punish splitpush, not doing it.

Timminatorr
<Editor>

Awards Showcase
Show more awards

Memorable (57)
Posts: 2376
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by drunkelf » April 10, 2014 10:38am | Report
I am a keeper of the light and ricki is my arch nemesis.I do enjoy watching him die with the help of my team mates when he did not now I had the gem.Its incridble difficult to push lanes when ricky can teleport to you at any momemt

drunkelf



Posts: 15
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by jawbreaker261 » April 11, 2014 6:06am | Report
mastadoom wrote:


I heard people bashing BF BH, so i TLDR this tread
http://dotabuff.com/players/83940200/matches?date=&duration=&faction=&game_mode=&hero=bounty-hunter&lobby_type=

I mean, without a BF how else are you supposed to rat doto bounty.


BH isn't a rat hero. Rat is based on splitpushing, global mobility, and disengagement. BH is based on ganking and track gold.

jawbreaker261


Notable (4)
Posts: 214
Steam: jawbreaker261

Quick Reply

Please log in or sign up to post!

DOTAFire is the place to find the perfect build guide to take your game to the next level. Learn how to play a new hero, or fine tune your favorite DotA hero’s build and strategy.

Copyright © 2019 DOTAFire | All Rights Reserved