Help Support Our Growing Community

DOTAFire is a community that lives to help every Dota 2 player take their game to the next level by having open access to all our tools and resources. Please consider supporting us by whitelisting us in your ad blocker!

Want to support DOTAFire with an ad-free experience? You can support us ad-free for less than $1 a month!

Go Ad-Free
Smitefire logo

Join the leading DOTA 2 community.
Create and share Hero Guides and Builds.

Create an MFN Account






Or

How to Comment Guides Properly

Please review our General Rules & Guidelines before posting or commenting anywhere on DOTAFire.

Forum » Mentoring » How to Comment Guides Properly 1 posts - page 1 of 1
Permalink | Quote | PM | +Rep by NinjaMovesPro » February 29, 2012 8:42am | Report


Purpose of this little discussion is just to point out some things about every day's comments each one of us is posting in this section. I have seen every sort of comments here, from detailed, well structured ones, to a simple "I like it" rather ******ed ones, and even some responses like "I don't have time yet, I'm gonna read it later."

Eh, sorry mate, but, why are you posting if you didn't read it yet? (This wasn't directed to nobody in particular, but I guess some of us might find ourselves in it).

Too much praise is not good, but so isn't too much criticism. If you praise someone too much (exceptions for the pieces that are really praise-worthy), the praised author will slowly develop a feeling that he already mastered the writing, and won't make any effort to improve.

On the other hand, if you write too much negative criticism on someone's work, there is high possibility that the criticized writer is just going to give up, having a feeling that he is just not made for writing.

So, here I will try to give some basic guidelines to the "proper" commenting. I quoted proper, because there really isn't a proper way to do it, otherwise all our comments would be look-a-like. On contrary, I will just try to give you some tips as I feel it would be nice to do it.



First part: Good Points & Strengths
    Always start your commenting with telling something good about story. Even the worst story here has something good in it. Hack, even if it completely sucks, tell the writer that you appreciate an effort he had put into writing. Also this will help the writer to look on the following criticism of yours as a helpful rather than a personal attack on him.


Second part: General Criticism
    Now comes the part where you actually put the good manners aside and decide to unleash all your rage on the poor writer! Well, not really. Even if you are giving negative comments, there is appropriate way of telling it.

    In this part you focus on some general flaws you might have noticed during reading, such as "love paragraphs", common repeating of few words, suddenly PoV change, inconstant tenses etc.

    What I really dislike is when I see people starting their comments directly by quoting and correcting the typos. Yes, correcting typos is part of the review, but it should not be presented first.


Third part: Specific Criticism
    Now all you typo-finders can have a relief. This part serves as a way to point at a certain wrong sentences and words in the story. Feel free to quote as much as you like. But just one thing. Before you start correction someone, make sure you do know the right way how to type that word or to rearrange that sentence, because just a negative comment without an advice is useless.


Fourth part: Summary
    You criticism should end in a positive way. If you finish your comment with in a positive spirit,as it is more likely that way the writer will take your criticism without any personal feeling, and actually will try to improve. Even if you have ran out of all ideas here, a simple " Good luck in further writing!" can conclude the whole commenting in a positive note.


Well, this is what I think about commenting and giving criticism. This isn't some rule of how it has to be done, but rather a small guideline for all of us. You don't have to stick to it, but if this read would make some impact on the way you are commenting, that means that I have succeeded in my original intention. Feel free to add something if you think differently than I do.

Good luck in further commenting!



An idea for writing, and the basic structure came to me from the following site: Reviewers' Handbook. I suggest you to take a look at it, as it goes more in-depth than my small article.

NinjaMovesPro


Notable (7)
Posts: 55
Steam: N/A
View My Blog

Quick Reply

Please log in or sign up to post!

DOTAFire is the place to find the perfect build guide to take your game to the next level. Learn how to play a new hero, or fine tune your favorite DotA hero’s build and strategy.

Copyright © 2019 DOTAFire | All Rights Reserved